Skip to content

Near Future Laboratory

Clarify Today, Design Tomorrow

About

You are browsing the archives of the Near Future Laboratory blog.

Join us to our office hours to discuss design, design fiction, projects you are working on and generaly Q&A.

Subscribe to our newsletter to be the first to hear from our cultural voyeurs and time-traveling anthropologists who regularly report on the signals and artifacts they bring back from the future.

Follow us on social media

• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• Medium
• Twitter

By Month

  • April 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • June 2005
  • March 2005
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003

Tag: Mobile Social Software

Disclose or Discover?

Aram Bartholl’s project “WoW” suddenly popped into my head as I was discussing the good old Mobile Social Software knee-jerk project — proximity-based friend finders. (Here is a decent video of Bartholl’s project in action.)

Proximity-based friend finders — these are the MoSoSo application/ideas in which people find people near them who share their interests, or what have you. It’s like friend searching online, or finding people with common interests, as we do directly or indirectly every so often online, only it’s done in physical space. The early canonical example is the LoveGetty device in which people key into the device certain simple parameters as to their preferences and people nearby whose devices find compatible preferences are alerted. It makes since, but truly only for a gag, or for a good cocktail party conversation. It’s simple disclosure of yourself — wearing your identity loudly in public, broadcasting it literally over the air for all to see.

We’re all used to various levels of identity disclosure online, almost always done on purpose, and deliberately. Sometimes it’s way over the top; other times its a simple, subtle representation of oneself in a modest Facebook page, or Twitter feed. Online is one thing, and the social people-practices engaged online are arguably just crawling out of the primordial goo. Aggregates of activity represent ourselves, still quite disparate and barely knit together — and it takes lots of effort to try and create a more cohesive quilt of identity, even in this age of feeds, aggregations and open APIs.

But in “real life” — in 1st life — people and their practices have had time to distill and refine the ways in which we create and represent and share who we are. in 1st life, we don’t so much disclose our identities — in the way WoW has a floating banner of our (avatar’s) name. Rather, we allow a sometimes baroque, sometimes simple process of discovery of identity.

And this is what makes Bartholl’s project so incisive and funny at the same time. How ridiculous to “broadcast” who we are in this fashion? It’s simply not consistent with the people-practices that are the norms in 1st life. And this is perhaps where Mobile Social Software can learn and understand that it’s not about the technology, no matter how simple it may seem to create linkages over networks in the real world. It’s about finding the consonant social practices that Mobile Social Software can facilitate, leading with people-principles before technology principles. That is where the design disruption lies.

Posted on June 6, 2008August 18, 2017Author JulianCategories Mobile, New Interaction Rituals, Proximity, Social PracticeTags Mobile Social Software
Proudly powered by WordPress